Wayne Bennett Wants to Change the NRL Finals: Is His Idea Better?

Photo: Getty Images

Wayne Bennett has thrown another major idea into the NRL's ongoing debate over the future of the competition, calling for a radical overhaul of the finals system.

The South Sydney coach has criticised the possibility of expanding the finals series to include 10 teams through a wildcard round, arguing that it could reward mediocrity and give teams with little realistic chance of winning the premiership a path into September.

Instead, Bennett has proposed a conference-style system similar to the structures used in American sport.

The idea comes as the NRL considers what the competition could look like as it expands, potentially to 20 teams.

Bennett's preferred model could involve two conferences of 10 teams, with the top four from each conference progressing to the finals. Another option he has floated would split the competition into four conferences of five teams, with the top two from each advancing.

The biggest question is whether a radical change would actually improve the NRL.

THE CASE FOR BENNETT'S IDEA

It could reward genuine quality. Bennett's biggest criticism of a 10-team wildcard system is that teams finishing 9th or 10th may have little realistic chance of winning the premiership.

The proposed wildcard concept would potentially allow more teams into the finals, but Bennett believes that simply creating more playoff places does not necessarily create better competition.

A conference system could instead create multiple competitive races throughout the season while ensuring the strongest teams still have a clear pathway towards the premiership.

One advantage of conferences is that teams could have more direct competition for playoff positions.

Instead of the same race involving every club, teams would have their own conference battles, potentially creating new rivalries and giving more games genuine significance.

This could become particularly valuable if the NRL eventually expands to 20 teams.

A conference system could allow the NRL to build rivalries around geography, history or commercial appeal.

With more teams entering the competition, creating clearly defined groups could give certain matchups greater importance.

It could also give the NRL more opportunities to market individual conference races throughout the season.

THE CASE AGAINST IT

It could make the ladder less meaningful. The beauty of the current NRL system is its simplicity.

Every team plays for the same premiership, competes on the same ladder and knows that finishing inside the top eight is the target. Conferences could complicate that system.

A team could finish with a significantly better record than another club but still have a different path to the finals because of the conference it was placed in.

It could create unfair advantages. This is perhaps the biggest concern.

If conferences aren't perfectly balanced, some teams could benefit from playing weaker opponents more frequently. The NRL would have to find a way to ensure the fixture remains fair.

Otherwise, the conference system could solve one problem while creating another.

Fans could also lose the simplicity of the current system. NRL fans know exactly what the ladder means. First through eighth qualify. The bottom nine don't. Simple.

Introducing conferences, different qualification pathways and potentially different schedules could make the competition harder for casual fans to follow.

The NRL's argument for expanding the finals is partly about entertainment.

More teams means more clubs with something to play for, more supporters engaged late in the season and potentially more blockbuster games.

The AFL's 10-team wildcard concept has already generated strong fan engagement and attendance, something NRL chairman Peter V'landys has pointed to when discussing the idea.

Bennett, however, sees the other side of the argument. If a 9th or 10th-placed team has little realistic chance of winning the premiership, is giving them a finals spot actually improving the competition — or simply creating more games?

SO, WHAT SHOULD THE NRL DO?

There is a genuine argument on both sides.

The current eight-team system rewards regular-season performance and gives the premiership a relatively straightforward pathway.

But as the NRL grows, the league may eventually need to rethink how the competition is structured. A wildcard round would provide more teams with something to play for.

A conference system could provide a completely different structure and potentially create new rivalries. Or the NRL could simply leave the current system alone.

And perhaps that's the most important question: Does the NRL actually need to change its finals system, or is the current top-eight format already working?

Bennett has made his position clear. Now the debate is whether his idea would make the NRL better or simply make it more complicated.