Piers Morgan: The Media's Biggest Ronaldo Glazer

Photo: Getty Images

Piers Morgan has spent the week defending Cristiano Ronaldo against some of football’s loudest voices, but has his admiration for the Portuguese superstar gone too far?

Few figures in football media are as closely associated with Cristiano Ronaldo as Piers Morgan.

After a week of explosive debates involving Simon Jordan, Sky Sports journalist Kaveh Solhekol and talkSPORT’s Jason Cundy, Morgan’s reputation as Ronaldo’s most passionate media defender is only growing, with his name in the headlines all week.

The latest controversy surrounds Ronaldo’s dramatic departure from Portugal’s national team camp and his subsequent statement explaining his side of the dispute with manager Roberto Martínez’s successor, Jorge Jesus.

Ronaldo claims the coach went back on an agreement over his playing time, while Jesus has disputed the circumstances surrounding the disagreement.

For Morgan, the explanation was enough to put Ronaldo firmly in the right. For his critics, it was another example of a superstar expecting special treatment.

Morgan’s latest exchanges with Jason Cundy have been particularly heated.

Appearing on Morgan’s show, the former Chelsea defender challenged the broadcaster’s insistence that Ronaldo had been wronged, arguing that managers must retain the freedom to change their plans and select the team they believe gives them the best chance of winning.

Cundy’s argument was straightforward: even a player of Ronaldo’s stature is not entitled to minutes on the pitch, and a manager’s decisions must ultimately be judged in the context of the team. Former striker Andy Gray also sided against Morgan during the discussion.

Morgan, however, has remained steadfast in his defence of Ronaldo, believing the issue comes down to respect, honesty and whether the promises made to the veteran forward were honoured.

The disagreement is bigger than one substitution. It is about whether Ronaldo should be judged by the same standards as every other player or whether his extraordinary career gives his complaints greater weight.

Morgan has made his position clear. His opponents believe that is precisely the problem.

Simon Jordan has also become a regular sparring partner for Morgan, with the pair bringing contrasting perspectives to their discussions.

Jordan, a former Crystal Palace owner and another professional douchebag, has questioned whether Ronaldo could be a common factor in repeated public disputes. Morgan has pushed back, arguing that Ronaldo deserves to be heard rather than automatically blamed whenever a disagreement emerges.

The two have also clashed over Manchester City’s financial case, demonstrating that their disagreements extend well beyond Ronaldo.

Sky Sports’ Kaveh Solhekol has provided another challenge to Morgan’s approach. In their recent discussions, Solhekol has questioned the evidence behind Ronaldo’s account and warned against accepting one side of a dispute as established fact.

The exchanges highlight the difficulty of separating a player’s version of events from the wider context. Ronaldo’s stature guarantees attention, but it does not automatically settle every disagreement in his favour.

For Morgan, though, defending Ronaldo has become a defining part of his football-media identity.

To understand the relationship, it is worth returning to November 2022.

Morgan conducted the explosive interview in which Ronaldo accused Manchester United of betraying him, criticised manager Erik ten Hag and claimed the Glazer family did not care about the club.

The interview sent shockwaves through English football. United subsequently announced that Ronaldo would leave the club by mutual agreement, bringing his second spell at Old Trafford to an abrupt end.

The interview cemented Morgan’s position as one of Ronaldo’s most prominent media allies. It also helped establish a dynamic that continues today: Ronaldo speaks, Morgan gives him a platform, and the football world argues about what it all means.

That is why the label “Ronaldo Glazer” is such a fitting provocation. Morgan has repeatedly stood beside the five-time Ballon d’Or winner when other pundits have questioned his conduct.

The question is whether that loyalty sometimes comes at the expense of impartial analysis.

There is a distinction between believing Ronaldo has been treated unfairly and believing he is almost always right.

Ronaldo’s achievements are beyond dispute. His goalscoring record, longevity and influence on the modern game have made him one of football’s defining players. His criticism of Manchester United’s ownership also raised issues that supporters had been discussing for years.

But greatness does not make a player immune from criticism. Managers must make difficult decisions, teammates must be treated fairly and even the biggest names can mishandle a situation.

That is the argument Morgan’s critics continue to make. They believe his admiration for Ronaldo can turn a discussion about football decisions into a defence of the player himself.

Morgan would likely argue that he is standing up for a footballer who deserves honesty and respect. His opponents would counter that respect must work both ways.

Morgan tends to have positive opinions of anyone more famous than him that acknowledges his existence. But his constant brown-nosing and throne-sniffing antics really gets under my skin.

The latest round of arguments has demonstrated that Morgan is no longer simply the broadcaster who landed Ronaldo’s famous Manchester United interview. He is now one of the central voices shaping the conversation whenever the Portuguese star finds himself in controversy.

His clashes with Cundy and Jordan have given the story another life, while Solhekol’s involvement has added a journalist’s scrutiny to the debate.

Whether viewers see Morgan as a loyal friend or an overly devoted fan, his role is undeniable. Ronaldo’s latest dispute has become a story not just about a legendary player and his manager, but also about the people who defend him and those who refuse to accept his version of events without question.